Should You Work With Me as a Coach or Therapist?
I can't lie—I held judgment toward 'coaches.' The idea that anyone could do it, with no governing body ensuring ethical practices, felt off to me. But as I continue toward my therapy license, coaching makes more and more sense. Through coaching, I can work with people outside of Utah, and I can help those who fear the stigma of therapy or the implications of a diagnosis, while still adhering to the same ethical and confidentiality standards I uphold as a therapist.
So, should you work with me as a therapist or a coach? Here are some quick pros and cons to consider:
Therapy:
Pros:
Covered by health insurance (depending on your plan).
Provides a formal diagnosis if needed for additional support or understanding.
Focuses on healing past trauma and addressing mental health concerns.
Bound by strict confidentiality laws.
Cons:
Requires a diagnosis, which becomes part of your medical record.
Restricted to the state where the therapist is licensed.
Often a longer-term process.
Coaching:
Pros:
No diagnosis or medical record involved.
Flexible and goal-oriented, focusing on actionable steps.
Can work with clients across state lines or internationally.
Ideal for those who want support with trauma or mental health concerns without engaging in the medical model.
Adheres to confidentiality standards as I bring my therapist background into my coaching practice.
Cons:
Not covered by health insurance; out-of-pocket expense.
The industry is unregulated, so quality can vary (though my therapy credentials provide reassurance).
Both coaching and therapy have unique benefits, and the choice ultimately depends on your needs. If you’re looking for someone to help you navigate trauma, mental health concerns, or personal growth in a structured way, either option can work—and I’m here to provide support tailored to what works best for you.
Whichever path you choose, the most important thing is taking that step toward growth—and I’d love to help you along the way.
